1By means of the criteria of leadership and organizational skills is evaluated the capacity of the chairperson with regard to the clear organization of the administrative activities, as judge or prosecutor, through rendering decisions and orders to ensure abidance by the deadlines and to utilize best the available resources, as well as to ensure the access and transparency at court.

2In the case of chairpersons of courts, the criteria of leadership and organizational skills is measured against the indicators pertaining to:

aAppropriate organization of the court into chambers or sections;

bNomination to adjudication panels;

cScheduling judges for urgent cases;

çAssignment of cases by lots;

dReplacement in due time of judges being inhibited during the proceedings;

dhConvening thematic meetings;

eEfficient scheduling and utilization of the public funds according to the court needs;

ëSupervision to the effect of improving the information in the official website of the court;

fSupervision to set up suitable environments in the court to the needs of the parties and the public, including the indicative signs in the court;

gTrainings organized for judges and for court employees.

3In the case of chairpersons of prosecution offices the criteria of leadership and organizational skills is measured against the indicators pertaining to:

aAppropriate organization of the prosecution office into sections;

bScheduling prosecutors for urgent cases;

cReplacement in due time of prosecutors being inhibited during the proceedings;

çConvening thematic meetings for the prosecutors of the prosecution office;

dEfficient scheduling and utilization of the public funds according to the prosecution office needs;

dhSupervision to the effect of improving the information in the official website of the prosecution office;

eSupervision to set up suitable environments in the prosecution office to the needs of the parties and the public;

ëTrainings organized for prosecutors and for prosecution office employees;

4The involvement of the chairperson in inter-institutional activities with regard to improving the justice system or at professional trainings with regard to the steering and management of the courts or prosecution offices shall be evaluated with priority in measuring this criterion.