"ON GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM "   |   115/2016

Article 132: Professional and moral criteria for the ranking of candidates

1The Independent Ad Hoc Commission shall do the ranking of candidates based on their professional merits, based on:

aoutcome of the professional evaluation and ethics of the candidates in the activities they have assumed in the past, as appropriate, or their performance in their employment experience, connected to the assumption of functions in the respective field connected to the activity of the institution wherefore he is putting up his candidacy;

bevaluation of the importance of academic works, scientific research, professional articles and speeches, publications, as well as participation at scientific activities, participation in the process of drafting or consultation of legislation and any other professional commitment of the candidates along the 5 recent years in the field of law;

cscores during the higher education cycles;

çprogress at work and participation at professional training and at other certified courses in the country and abroad;

2The Commission shall do the ranking of candidates based on their moral merits, based on:

areputation that the candidate enjoys in the society and among the colleagues;

bmoral qualities such as honesty, accuracy in assuming the tasks, accountability, reliability, impartiality, dignity, tendency to assume responsibility, professional ethics, use of all legal means for the loyal protection of the rights of persons represented by him;

cestablished commitment for following the causes of the civil society.

3The Commissions shall do the ranking of the candidates based on their organisational, steering and managerial merits, based on:

aquality of the platform and vision they submit;

bestablished skills for making decisions and responsibility based on the previous professional and social experience;

ccommunication skills;

çskills to work in teams and in multi-disciplinary or multi-cultural environments;

dskills of representation in public.

4Along with the criteria provided for in points 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, for the purposes of evaluating the candidates, account shall be taken of:

aholding the academic titles;

bstudies and long term training abroad;

cknowledge of foreign languages.

5The Commission shall interview the candidates and commit the experts for the verification of their skills, specifically for verifying their level of command of foreign languages.

6In compliance with the provisions of this Chapter, the Ad Hoc Commission shall approve the rules for further detailing the criteria and for determining their specific weight in ranking the candidates.

7In making the decisions for the ranking of candidates, the Commission shall act in accordance with the criteria provided for in points 1 through 5 of this Article and draft a report providing grounds for such ranking.

Table of Content

    • No Comment
    • No Comment
    • No Comment
    • No Comment
    • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment
  • No Comment