1The evaluation of the performance of the chairperson shall consist of three grades:
a“Very good” in case of performing the leading activities above average;
b“Good” in case of an average performance of the leading activities;
c“Acceptable” in case of performing the leading activities below the average.
2The general evaluation “very good” is awarded if the leading performance of the chairperson is evaluated “very good” in both criteria. The general evaluation ‘acceptable’ is awarded if the performance of the chairperson is evaluated ‘acceptable’ in at least one of the criteria. In other cases, the leading activity of the chairperson shall be evaluated ‘good’.